Skip to content
ImNotAnAttorney logo

Federal Bench — District of South Carolina

Charles Houck

Aggregate sentencing patterns and caseload data for Charles Houck compiled from verified federal court records. Statistical frequencies only — never a prediction about a specific case or defendant.

Source: USSC FY14-23 × CourtListener federal dockets — generated May 6, 2026

Name-match note: Records were linked across USSC and CourtListener with a name-similarity score of 0.67. Below 0.80 the link is weaker — verify the cl_person_id matches the judge before relying on this profile.

Sentencing & Caseload Snapshot

USSC Sentences

256

FY14-23 indexed

Median Sentence

47.0 mo

across indexed cases

Total Dockets

5,401

indexed in corpus

Criminal Fraction

16.8%

of indexed dockets

Aggregate frequencies from public USSC sentencing datafiles and CourtListener docket records. Not a prediction about any specific case.

Sentencing Distribution

Distribution metrics from 256 indexed USSC sentences. Departure rates indicate how often sentences fell outside the calculated guideline range.

Sentencing distribution from USSC FY14-23 datafiles
MetricValue
Median sentence47.0 mo
Mean sentence72.3 mo
Interquartile range (P25 — P75)15.0 mo 120.0 mo
Downward departure rate40.0%
Upward departure rate0.0%
Substantial-assistance rate
Government-sponsored below-range rate

Source: USSC FY14-23 individual offender datafiles.

Offense Mix

Top offense categories among indexed sentences. A judge's offense mix reflects the docket they were assigned, not their personal selection.

  • drug trafficking114 (44.5%)
  • extortion racketeering63 (24.6%)
  • gambling31 (12.1%)
  • kidnapping18 (7.0%)
  • burglary6 (2.3%)
  • prison4 (1.6%)
  • immigration3 (1.2%)
  • money laundering3 (1.2%)

Want the Full Judge Report Card?

The $197 Judge Report Card adds the full sentencing fingerprint, prosecutor pairing patterns, bench-vs-jury divergence analysis, and a curated quote library. The $997 Intelligence Brief layers on additional accountability research for your attorney to review.

This is legal information, not legal advice. Aggregate data from verified public court records. Nothing here predicts a specific outcome.