Skip to content
ImNotAnAttorney logo

Federal Bench — Western District of Tennessee

Judge Samuel Mays

Western District of Tennessee — Sentencing Profile

Aggregate sentencing patterns and caseload data for Samuel Mays compiled from verified federal court records. Statistical frequencies only — never a prediction about a specific case or defendant.

Generated June 19, 2026

Name-match note: Records were linked across USSC and CourtListener with a name-similarity score of 0.55. Below 0.80 the link is weaker — verify the cl_person_id matches the judge before relying on this profile.

Sentencing & Caseload Snapshot

USSC Sentences

1,591

FY14-23 indexed

Median Sentence

46.0 mo

across indexed cases

Total Dockets

4,734

indexed in corpus

Criminal Fraction

17.4%

of indexed dockets

Aggregate frequencies from public USSC sentencing datafiles and CourtListener docket records. Not a prediction about any specific case.

Sentencing Distribution

Distribution metrics from 1,591 indexed USSC sentences. Departure rates indicate how often sentences fell outside the calculated guideline range.

Sentencing distribution from USSC FY14-23 datafiles
MetricValue
Median sentence46.0 mo
Mean sentence104.5 mo
Interquartile range (P25 — P75)16.0 mo 92.0 mo
Downward departure rate45.0%
Upward departure rate1.0%
Substantial-assistance rate
Government-sponsored below-range rate

Offense Mix

Top offense categories among indexed sentences. A judge's offense mix reflects the docket they were assigned, not their personal selection.

  • extortion racketeering534 (33.6%)
  • drug trafficking458 (28.8%)
  • gambling173 (10.9%)
  • prison48 (3.0%)
  • fraud47 (3.0%)
  • burglary45 (2.8%)
  • kidnapping44 (2.8%)
  • stalking harassing31 (1.9%)

Want the Full Judge Report Card?

The $197 Judge Report Card adds the full sentencing fingerprint, prosecutor pairing patterns, bench-vs-jury divergence analysis, and a curated quote library. The $997 Intelligence Brief layers on additional accountability research for your attorney to review.

This is legal information, not legal advice. Aggregate data from verified public court records. Nothing here predicts a specific outcome.